Discussion:
PGP Key for Not-My-Name Nymserver
(too old to reply)
Fritz Wuehler
2010-08-31 03:24:27 UTC
Permalink
How about signing the key?
Kulin Remailer
2010-08-31 05:18:22 UTC
Permalink
In article
Post by Fritz Wuehler
How about signing the key?
What on earth for?
Anonymous
2010-08-31 18:25:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kulin Remailer
In article
Post by Fritz Wuehler
How about signing the key?
What on earth for?
So we know it's the real key and not an attempt at MITM?
Kulin Remailer
2010-09-01 00:49:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Anonymous
Post by Kulin Remailer
In article
Post by Fritz Wuehler
How about signing the key?
What on earth for?
So we know it's the real key and not an attempt at MITM?
If it's not the real key, it won't work. You'll know then.
Fritz Wuehler
2010-09-01 14:55:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kulin Remailer
Post by Anonymous
Post by Kulin Remailer
Post by Fritz Wuehler
How about signing the key?
What on earth for?
So we know it's the real key and not an attempt at MITM?
If it's not the real key, it won't work. You'll know then.
Yeah unless somebody redirects the DNS or hijacks the site.

Always better to clearsign the key.
Anne Onime
2010-09-02 01:16:00 UTC
Permalink
In article
Post by Fritz Wuehler
Post by Kulin Remailer
Post by Anonymous
Post by Kulin Remailer
Post by Fritz Wuehler
How about signing the key?
What on earth for?
So we know it's the real key and not an attempt at MITM?
If it's not the real key, it won't work. You'll know then.
Yeah unless somebody redirects the DNS or hijacks the site.
Always better to clearsign the key.
And who would sign it? Zax? you might have heard of him and that
causes you to trust anything with his signature on it. The rest
of the world doesn't. Signing the key is pointless.
Fritz Wuehler
2010-09-04 23:04:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Anne Onime
Post by Fritz Wuehler
Post by Kulin Remailer
Post by Anonymous
Post by Kulin Remailer
Post by Fritz Wuehler
How about signing the key?
What on earth for?
So we know it's the real key and not an attempt at MITM?
If it's not the real key, it won't work. You'll know then.
Yeah unless somebody redirects the DNS or hijacks the site.
Always better to clearsign the key.
And who would sign it? Zax? you might have heard of him and that
causes you to trust anything with his signature on it. The rest
of the world doesn't. Signing the key is pointless.
Yes, asshole. The guy who owns the key should clearsign it.

If you think that's pointless then you have no idea what signing is for.
Zax
2010-09-02 07:24:34 UTC
Permalink
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:55:50 +0200, Fritz Wuehler wrote in
Post by Fritz Wuehler
Always better to clearsign the key.
There is a detached signature for the key at http://www.is-not-my.name.

The reason for not clearsigning it in postings is that is escapes the
PGP cutmarks and tends to confuse people.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEAREKAAYFAkx/UTIACgkQlKZ6CY7Vd0N4EQCgjD69IPTX6n20wyHXlj6hZQax
LEAAoMuHwArlybuTZ1eNLCzKZY7D0QPh
=XaQe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
pub 1024D/8ED57743 2003-07-08 Bananasplit Operator
Key fingerprint = 796F 67E0 E890 A0BB BDAE EBB4 94A6 7A09 8ED5 7743
uid Admin <admin.mixmin.net>
Anonymous
2010-09-04 20:59:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Zax
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:55:50 +0200, Fritz Wuehler wrote in
Post by Fritz Wuehler
Always better to clearsign the key.
There is a detached signature for the key at http://www.is-not-my.name.
The reason for not clearsigning it in postings is that is escapes the
PGP cutmarks and tends to confuse people.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Thanks.
Loading...